Although I had a difficult time
finding even three articles on best practices for distance education for the K-12
learner, I read a few more that addressed educational best practices for the K-12
learner using technology in the classroom. Cher Ping Lim(2004) states that
learners need instruction in how to learn online to get them started, they need
advance organizers to process the learning to come, and they need scaffolding “provided
by the instructors or through peer interactions, or … embedded in the online learning
component (Lim, July/Aug, 2004)” to help
them get the most out of their online learning experience. Another article examined the barriers to
changing classroom instruction to reflect best practice which the authors
identified as learner-centered instruction (An
& Reigeluth, 2011). A third article addressed the advantages of
individualized instruction with a 1:1 ratio of students to computers in a
classroom (Rosen & Beck-Hill, 2012). All
three of these articles are based on the constructivist theory of learning
which states that the learner constructs knowledge based on his experiences (Seel, 2008). My favorite style of
learner-centered instruction, probably because it fits so well in the math
classroom, is problem-based learning, or PBL. In PBL, the teacher sets up a
problem based on or modeled after a real-world problem. Usually in small
groups, students then try to solve the problem as the teacher guides them with
strategies and problem-solving skills. The series of textbooks I used when I
taught elementary and middle school math was authored by a man named Saxon and
commonly called Saxon math. He believed in teaching students how to identify
and categorize math word problems at an early age, so (as an example) students
learned that a “some and some more” was an addition pattern which could require
addition or subtraction to solve based on what was missing in the problem. Several other
patterns were taught, giving students strategies to recognize and solve
real-world problems. If a student is taught via PBL, he is more likely to
develop his own problem-solving strategies, giving him more independence. I
believe the purpose of education is exactly this, to teach students to think
independently (higher order thinking), knowing how to reason things out for
themselves, so they can become lifelong learners.
References:
An, Y.-J., & Reigeluth, C. (2011). Creating
technology-enhanced, learner-centered classrooms: K–12 teachers’ beliefs,
perceptions, barriers, and support needs. Journal of Digital Learning in
Teacher Education, 28(2), 54 - 62.
Cote, D. (Sep 2007). Problem-based learning software for
students with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43(1), 29
- 37.
Lim, C. P. (July/Aug, 2004). Engaging learners in online
learning environments. Tech Trends, 48(4), 16 - 23.
Rosen, Y., & Beck-Hill, D. (2012). Intertwining digital
content and a one-to-one laptop environment in teaching and learning: Lessons
from the time to know program. Journal of Research on Technology in
Education, 44(3), 225 -241.
Seel, N. M. (2008). Empirical perspectives on memory and motivation.
In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. V. Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll, Handbook
of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 39 -54). New
York: Routledge.
One thing that I have found is that students definitely need to be taught to think. When modeling, I use a think-aloud strategy to help my students understand the thinking process. The PBL is very good for that. In distance education I can see a teacher creating a video lesson and modeling the thinking that would go along with the project.
ReplyDelete